Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 23, Iss. 2 > Art. 27 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
Participatory identification and selection of ecosystem services: building on field experiences

Fanny Boeraeve, Biodiversity and Landscape Unit, TERRA Research Center, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege
Marc Dufrene, Biodiversity and Landscape Unit, TERRA Research Center, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege
Rik De Vreese, Public Health Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
Sander Jacobs, Research Team Nature and Society, Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO); Belgian Ecosystems and Society community (BEES), Belgian Biodiversity Platform
Nathalie Pipart, Department of Geography, University of Namur; Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
Francis Turkelboom, Research Team Nature and Society, Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO)
Wim Verheyden, Research Team Nature and Society, Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO)
Nicolas Dendoncker, Department of Geography, University of Namur; Transition Institute, University of Namur

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-10087-230227

Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Abstract

The concept of ecosystem services (ESs) has become a popular tool for science that aims to support decision making for sustainable management of natural resources. With the aim to integrate nature’s diverse values in decisions and to reach effective actions, it is recommended that valuations begin with a participatory identification of the most relevant ESs to be included in the assessment. Despite being a crucial step directly influencing decision making, experiences of researchers with real-life applications are seldom reported. Our aim is to advance the organization and implementation of participatory ES identification and selection by providing a self-reflective description and discussion of 5 case studies (CSs). A self-evaluation workshop was organized among the researchers involved in the CSs to gather factors of success and failure encountered throughout the process. From this reflection, we suggest a list of 11 recommendations. We use a wide range of the literature on participatory research evaluation to guide our reflection and demonstrate the relevance of participatory science to the field of ESs. Reflexivity proved to be an essential aspect of sharing lessons learned and advancing methodology toward real-life impact.

Key words

ecosystem services; integrated ecosystem service valuation; natural resource management; participatory; transdisciplinary

Copyright © 2018 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Top
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087