Assessing the institutional foundations of adaptive water governance in South India
Sechindra Vallury, W.A. Franke College of Forestry & Conservation, University of Montana
Hoon C. Shin, Institute of Water Policy, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore
Marco A. Janssen, School of Sustainability, Arizona State University
Ruth Meinzen-Dick, International Food Policy Research Institute
Sandeep Kandikuppa, Environment Ecology and Energy Program, University of North Carolina
Kaushalendra R. Rao, SELCO Foundation
Rahul Chaturvedi, Foundation for Ecological Security
Full Text: HTML
Institutional structures can fundamentally shape opportunities for adaptive governance of water resources at multiple ecological and societal scales. The properties of adaptive governance have been widely examined in the literature. However, there has been limited focus on how institutions can promote or hinder the emergence of adaptive governance. Elinor Ostrom’s institutional theory stresses the importance of formal and informal norms and rules in effective governance of natural resources. Specifically, Ostrom’s “design principles” (DPs) are considered important because they increase the capacity for adaptive decision making and facilitate the emergence of self-organization at smaller scales. Self-organizing agents can frequently modify rules-in-use, procedures, and technical methods to tackle changing ecological conditions and address significant management issues left by more traditional governments. In this study, we examine institutional arrangements for successful water governance by analyzing (1) the co-occurrence of DPs in irrigation systems, and (2) the combination(s) of DPs leading to social and ecological success. We collaborated with a local non-profit organization to review institutional records and conduct interviews in 50 irrigation communities in Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka in South India. Using qualitative comparative analysis, we found that the effectiveness of design principles is contingent on biophysical properties, such as the size of the watershed being governed, and attributes of the community, such as population size. We also discuss the methodological and data-related challenges involved in collecting primary data for conducting a context-specific institutional analysis. Our study offers a much-needed example of empirical research that investigates the role of operational level rules in adaptive water governance.
adaptive water governance; design principles; institutions; irrigation systems; qualitative comparative analysis
Copyright © 2022 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.