Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 13, Iss. 1 > Art. 20 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
Setting Biodiversity Targets in Participatory Regional Planning: Introducing Ecoprofiles

Paul Opdam, Alterra Landscape Centre, Wageningen University and Research; Department of Land Use Planning, Wageningen University
Rogier Pouwels, Alterra Landscape Centre, Wageningen University and Research
Sabine van Rooij, Alterra Landscape Centre, Wageningen University and Research
Eveliene Steingröver, Alterra Landscape Centre, Wageningen University and Research
Claire C Vos, Alterra Landscape Centre, Wageningen University and Research


Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


In highly developed regions, ecosystems are often severely fragmented, whereas the conservation of biodiversity is highly rated. Regional and local actor groups are often involved in the regional planning, but when making decisions they make insufficient use of scientific knowledge of the ecological system that is being changed. The ecological basis of regional landscape change would be improved if knowledge-based systems tailored to the cyclic process of planning and negotiation and to the expertise of planners, designers and local interest groups were available.

If regional development is to be sustainable, goals for biodiversity must be set in relation to the actual and demanded patterns of ecosystems. We infer a set of prerequisites for the effective use of biodiversity goal-setting methods in multi-stakeholder decision making. Among these prerequisites are the requirements that ecosystem patterns are set central and that methods integrate the demands of a suite of species, are spatially explicit, and allow the aspiration level to be modified during the planning process. The decision making must also be enriched with local ecological knowledge. The current methods for setting biodiversity targets lack crucial characteristics—in particular, flexibility—and often require too high a level of ecological expertise. The ecoprofile method we designed combines an ecosystem base with spatial conditions for species metapopulations. We report experiences with this approach in two case studies, showing that the method was understood by policy makers, planners, and stakeholders, and was useful in negotiation processes. We recommend experimenting with applying this approach in a variety of circumstances, to further improve its ecological basis.

Key words

Biodiversity targets; ecosystem networks; landscape ecology; metapopulation persistence; multifunctional landscapes; multi-stakeholder decision making; regional planning; sustainable development

Copyright © 2008 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087