Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 17, Iss. 1 > Art. 21 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
Forest Landscape Restoration in the Drylands of Latin America

Adrian C Newton, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
Rafael F. del Castillo, Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional, Oaxaca, Mexico
Cristian Echeverría, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
Davide Geneletti, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Ambientale, Università degli Studi di Trento, Trento, Italy; Center for International Development, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
Mario González-Espinosa, Departamento de Ecología y Sistemática Terrestres, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Chiapas, Mexico
Lucio R Malizia, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, Argentina; Fundación ProYungas, Jujuy, Argentina
Andrea C Premoli, Laboratorio Ecotono, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Argentina
José M. Rey Benayas, Departamento de Ecología, Universidad de Acalá, Madrid, Spain
Cecilia Smith-Ramírez, Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB) and Instituto de Manejo Forestal, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
Guadalupe Williams-Linera, Instituto de Ecología, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico


Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR) involves the ecological restoration of degraded forest landscapes, with the aim of benefiting both biodiversity and human well-being. We first identify four fundamental principles of FLR, based on previous definitions. We then critically evaluate the application of these principles in practice, based on the experience gained during an international, collaborative research project conducted in six dry forest landscapes of Latin America. Research highlighted the potential for FLR; tree species of high socioeconomic value were identified in all study areas, and strong dependence of local communities on forest resources was widely encountered, particularly for fuelwood. We demonstrated that FLR can be achieved through both passive and active restoration approaches, and can be cost-effective if the increased provision of ecosystem services is taken into account. These results therefore highlight the potential for FLR, and the positive contribution that it could make to sustainable development. However, we also encountered a number of challenges to FLR implementation, including the difficulty of achieving strong engagement in FLR activities among local stakeholders, lack of capacity for community-led initiatives, and the lack of an appropriate institutional and regulatory environment to support restoration activities. Successful implementation of FLR will require new collaborative alliances among stakeholders, empowerment and capacity building of local communities to enable them to fully engage with restoration activities, and an enabling public policy context to enable local people to be active participants in the decision making process.

Key words

biodiversity; conservation; dryland; ecological restoration; forest landscape; Latin America; reforestation; rehabilitation

Copyright © 2012 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087