Table 1. Summary of conclusions.
|
|
|
Polycentricity |
Participation |
Experimentation |
Bioregional Approach |
|
Theoretically sound? |
Yes, but there are concerns about transaction costs
and accountability. |
Yes. |
Yes, but experiments as a research methodology yield
limited reflexivity. Management as experimentation is only supported if the
experiments are small in scale. |
Yes. Preference is shifting from unitary river-basin
organizations as a means of implementing a river-basin management approach to
collaborative, polycentric arrangements. |
Feasible? |
Fact of life, but the value of diversity is not always
understood. |
Depends on the willingness and ability of authorities to
organize participation, and of potential participants to become
involved. |
Experiments are often difficult to implement because
of societal resistance (equity concerns). The political landscape is often transformed
by the time the experiment is finished. |
Unitary river-basin organizations are very rare;
collaborations at the river-basin scale are increasingly
popular. |
Effective? |
Not much can be said because of the lack of monitoring data
and the attribution problem. |
Can contribute to the quality and legitimacy of
decisions, but the connection to the formal decision process needs to be clearly
specified. |
Not much known, but in other policy domains,
experiments are often watered down to “pilots.” |
Not much can be said because of the lack of monitoring data
and the attribution problem. |
|
|
|