Response variable
|
Independent
variablea
|
Beta
|
1 SE (Beta)
|
Partial r
|
Partial F
|
P
|
| Proportion
of path length traveled
in the open (m) EpsilonDOa/(EpsilonDOa+EpsilonDFa)b |
DOi
/ DFi
|
-126.4
|
12.5
|
-0.64
|
101.8
|
<0.0001
|
| DOi
(m)
|
1.04
|
0.21
|
0.39
|
25.3
|
<0.0001
| |
| DOi
x DOi/ DFi
|
-2.04
|
0.29
|
-0.50
|
49.1
|
<0.0001
| |
| Group
size
|
0.33
|
0.44
|
0.06
|
0.6
|
0.5
| |
| Constant
|
90.1
|
14.8
|
-
|
37.3
|
<0.0001
| |
| Risk
area (m2) (square-root transformed) |
DOi
/ DFi
|
-68.4
|
6.3
|
-0.67
|
116.7
|
<0.0001
|
| DOi
(m)
|
0.09
|
0.03
|
0.25
|
9.9
|
0.002
| |
| DOi
x DOi/ DFi
|
-0.14
|
0.16
|
-0.07
|
0.8
|
0.4
| |
| Group
size
|
-0.32
|
0.27
|
-0.10
|
1.4
|
0.2
| |
| Constant
|
22.1
|
2.1
|
-
|
109.7
|
<0.0001
| |
| Forest edge distance (m) | DOi
/ DFi
|
-35.5
|
4.04
|
-0.59
|
77.2
|
<0.0001
|
| DOi
(m)
|
0.07
|
0.02
|
0.33
|
17.4
|
0.0001
| |
| DOi
x DOi/ DFi
|
-0.26
|
0.10
|
-0.21
|
6.8
|
0.01
| |
| Group
size
|
-0.17
|
0.17
|
-0.08
|
1.0
|
0.3
| |
| Constant
|
13.3
|
1.3
|
-
|
98.1
|
<0.0001
|
a DOi (80.4 + 33.3 m, mean + 1 SD) and DOi/ DFi (0.67 + 0.17) were centered on their means to reduce collinearity. Group size averaged 7.3 + 3.3 individuals and ranged between 1 and 18 individuals.
b To avoid confounding multiple response variables in the analysis, the response variable was, in fact, Epsilon DOa and the model included the total path length (Epsilon DOa + Epsilon DFa) as a covariable. Because the effects of the covariable are held constant in the analysis, the model can be interpreted as investigating the influence of the other independent variables on the proportion of path length traveled in the open.