Table 3. Comparison of per hectare and per household forest extraction values derived from Godoy et al. (2000:62–63 and personal communication).
Village
|
|
No. house-
holds |
|
Catch-
ment size (ha) |
|
Implied wealth status
|
|
Unit deriveda
|
|
US$ per ha per yr
|
|
Total value ($/yr) |
|
Household value (US$/yr) |
||||||
1995 |
1996 |
1995 |
1996 |
1995 |
1996 |
|||||||||||||||
Yapuwas |
16 |
2779 |
“Poor” |
PPP |
8.6 |
7.8 |
23,900 |
21,676 |
1494 |
1355
| ||||||||||
Exchange |
2.7 |
2.6 |
7375 |
5428 |
498 |
339 |
||||||||||||||
Krausirpe |
53 |
2676 |
“Rich” |
PPP |
38.7 |
27.7 |
103,570 |
74,132 |
1954 |
1399
|
||||||||||
Exchange |
12.2 |
9.4
|
|
34,560
|
18,565 |
652 |
350 | |||||||||||||