Submit a Response
Response to:
Quantifying large-scale impacts of cattle grazing on annual burn probability in Napa and Sonoma Counties, California
Starrs, G. I., K. J. Siegel, S. Larson, and V. Butsic. 2024. Quantifying large-scale impacts of cattle grazing on annual burn probability in Napa and Sonoma Counties, California. Ecology and Society 29(3):10.
The following peer-reviewed responses to this article have been published:
Quantifying large-scale impacts of cattle grazing on annual burn probability in Napa and Sonoma Counties, California
Starrs, G. I., K. J. Siegel, S. Larson, and V. Butsic. 2024. Quantifying large-scale impacts of cattle grazing on annual burn probability in Napa and Sonoma Counties, California. Ecology and Society 29(3):10.
Carnivores’ contributions to people in Europe
Palacios-Pacheco, S., B. Martín-López, M. Expósito-Granados, J. M. Requena-Mullor, J. Lozano, J. A. Sánchez-Zapata, Z. Morales-Reyes, and A. J. Castro. 2024. Carnivores’ contributions to people in Europe. Ecology and Society 29(3):9.
Place-based knowledge transfer in a local-to-global and knowledge-to-action context: key steps and facilitative factors
Sievers, E., M. Spierenburg, S. S. Jhagroe, and A. P. E. van Oudenhoven. 2024. Place-based knowledge transfer in a local-to-global and knowledge-to-action context: key steps and facilitative factors. Ecology and Society 29(3):8.
The importance of geodiversity in understanding and conserving the Western Rift Valley Corridor
Miller, W. D., J. M. Anderson, and M. Doucouré. 2024. The importance of geodiversity in understanding and conserving the Western Rift Valley Corridor. Ecology and Society 29(3):7.
The good, the bad, and the unseen: wild mammal encounters influence wildlife preferences of residents across socio-demographic gradients
Moesch, S. S., T. M. Straka, J. M. Jeschke, D. Haase, and S. Kramer-Schadt. 2024. The good, the bad, and the unseen: wild mammal encounters influence wildlife preferences of residents across socio-demographic gradients. Ecology and Society 29(3):6.
If you wish to submit a response and you are already registered with the journal, follow this link. If you have never registered with the journal, please follow this link.
We welcome comments from readers that summarize data or experiences, or that review other papers or books that amplify the original article. Comments will be accepted only if factual, thoughtful, and substantive. If opinions are included, they must move the discussion forward. The Editor-in-Chief who oversaw the peer-review of this article will act as the moderator of all responses. If a response is accepted for publication, it will be linked to the original article under the heading “Responses to this Article”.
A response may be of any length, and may include additional materials such as figures or tables. Short responses (under 250 words) will be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief of the original article. Longer responses and those that include additional material will be subject to more rigorous screening. All responses that are accepted for publication will appear as separate articles, but will be cross-linked to the original article.